Axiom works the deduction clearing account line by line and tells you which deductions your contracts never permitted — each with the clause quoted, the page it resolved on, and the arithmetic set out to be redone by hand.
Axiom holds no credentials into your general ledger and writes nothing to it. Approved recoveries leave as balanced entries your team reviews and posts.
We have no customer outcomes to average, so we publish no yield and project no expansion. You see your own findings before you owe anything.
When a deduction is genuinely valid, the finding says so and names the clause that makes it valid. A clean ledger includes the losses you chose to take.
Each line carries the clause it rests on, the page that clause resolved on, and the verdict a person put on it — so the figure at the foot is a sum of defensible parts rather than an estimate.
A sixth deduction could not be verified at all: no clause resolved against it, so it carries no amount and no recommendation. It comes back with the gap named rather than a number you would have to defend.
Axiom
Terms extracted from the signed agreements, arithmetic computed in code.
A staff auditor
Signed the five findings above and rejected the ones that could not be defended.
Your controller
Axiom holds no credentials into your general ledger and posts nothing to it.
Every finding arrives with the clause it rests on and the arithmetic that produced it — the two things you need when someone asks where a number came from.
Every approved recovery comes out as a balanced entry ready for review — the coding, the amount, and the finding it came from. Your controller posts it, because we cannot.
Open short-pays sort into aging buckets with the oldest surfaced first. Most become permanent write-offs not because they were indefensible but because nobody looked in time.
When a deduction is genuinely valid, the finding names the clause that makes it valid. An auditor asking why forty thousand dollars went to the allowance gets a citation, not a shrug.
Pricing variance, shortage claims, freight, unearned discounts, promo and MDF. The pattern in that split usually says more than the total: it names the AP process worth renegotiating.
A language model does one job: reading a contract and returning the terms it found. Every dollar after that is computed deterministically in integer cents and can be recomputed by hand.
The audit runs against your own export and your own contracts, so what comes back is what your book actually contains — not a benchmark drawn from someone else's business.
Send twelve months of remittance data and the contracts behind it. What comes back is your number, line by line, with the clause and the arithmetic attached to each one — and the deductions we tell you to let go, listed with the clause that makes them legitimate.